Which measurement is considered best for assessing visceral fat?

The waist-to-hip ratio is considered the best measurement for assessing visceral fat because it provides a direct indication of fat distribution in the body. Visceral fat is the fat that surrounds internal organs and is linked to various health risks, including cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. The waist-to-hip ratio specifically looks at the proportion of fat stored around the waist relative to the hips, which can highlight central obesity. Central obesity is a strong indicator of visceral fat accumulation, making this measurement particularly useful for evaluating health risks associated with excess visceral fat.

While other methods such as skinfold measurements, BMI, and circumference can provide information on overall body fat or general obesity, they do not specifically focus on the distribution of fat around the waist or how it correlates to health outcomes associated with visceral fat. Skinfold measurements may not accurately reflect visceral fat since they are primarily subcutaneous and can be influenced by various factors like hydration status. BMI is a useful screening tool for categorizing weight status but does not differentiate between fat and muscle mass or provide insights into where fat is distributed in the body. Circumference measurements can indicate overall fat levels, but the waist-to-hip ratio gives a more precise assessment of health risks associated with visceral fat specifically.