What motivational interviewing technique is applied when the coach acknowledges both the benefits and risks a client perceives?

The technique that involves acknowledging both the benefits and risks perceived by a client is known as double-sided reflection. This approach is particularly effective in motivational interviewing because it allows the coach to validate the client's feelings and thoughts while also highlighting the complexity of their situation. By reflecting both sides, the coach helps the client see the ambivalence they may be experiencing, which can facilitate deeper exploration of their motivations and barriers to change.

Double-sided reflection creates a space for clients to feel understood and heard, often leading to greater self-awareness and movement towards resolving their ambivalence. This technique helps clients articulate their motivations and hesitations clearly, paving the way for them to consider changes in their behavior.

The other options do not accurately capture the essence of acknowledging both the pros and cons as effectively as double-sided reflection does. Simple reflection focuses on restating what the client has said without additional context, agreement with a twist tries to acknowledge a client's statement but adds a counterpoint, and clarification seeks to ensure understanding without necessarily addressing the duality of the client's perspective.