In response to a client's skepticism about the coach's ability to help, what reflection technique is exemplified in the coach's response regarding the client's doubts?

The double-sided reflection technique is effective in acknowledging and exploring the client’s skepticism while also highlighting their strengths or reasons for seeking help. In the context of the coach's response, this approach allows for a recognition of the client's doubts as valid, while simultaneously addressing the potential for positive outcomes.

For instance, if a client expresses feeling unsure about how coaching can help them, using a double-sided reflection would involve the coach reflecting back this skepticism but also reminding the client of times when they have successfully made changes in the past or the reasons they initially sought coaching. This balancing act validates the client's feelings while fostering a sense of hope and empowerment.

The use of simple reflection might only restate what the client has said without adding any depth or complexity, which could leave the client's skepticism unchallenged. Amplified reflection takes the client’s doubts and exaggerates them, which can sometimes draw attention to them in an unhelpful way or lead the client to feel misunderstood. Therefore, the double-sided technique is particularly valuable as it addresses both sides of the client’s experience, making it a suitable method in this scenario.